How does an Adventist get around Jesus statement?

[theMadJW]

"You, the ONLY true God" (speaking of his God and Father)- John 17:3.

Did God have a God, much less two OTHERS?

 

[Chief]

I received an ANSWER! "NO"!
When someone is called his "son'- he had a BEGINNING!

I'm sure he will have the same clergy goofiplantions for thus:

Col 1:15- He is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation.

Clergy goofiplantions for this is that it's only a title!
Buuuuuuuuut, it specifies he is called a part of creation!

How would you explain Hebrews 7:3 "He is without father or mother or genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but resembling the Son of God he continues a priest forever."

 

[rob]

I received an ANSWER! "NO"!
When someone is called his "son'- he had a BEGINNING!

I'm sure he will have the same clergy goofiplantions for thus:

Col 1:15- He is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation.

Clergy goofiplantions for this is that it's only a title!
Buuuuuuuuut, it specifies he is called a part of creation!

Let me ask you my friend, does a father have a beginning?

Because in my child like brain, a son come from a father too?

So these English terms are not correct, describing the Divine persons here... do you consider it
a terrible translation issue? Can you describe GOD using English words even?

Pr 8:22 ¶ The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.

This is the ONLY verse in the OT explaining the "me" using two Hebrew words "beginning" and "eternal back in time"

Now why must the JW invent notions the Bible does not say?

 

[theMadJW]

You are beyond reasoning, antichrist.

 

[theMadJW]

He was a SON of God, not a CLONE of God!

 

[Emmett Theodoran]

"You, the ONLY true God" (speaking of his God and Father)- John 17:3.

Did God have a God, much less two OTHERS?

No, God is the only God. No others.

 

[rob]

He was a SON of God, not a CLONE of God!

You don't know the way humans are born or made, a Son is technically a genetic clone
Why can't the Infinity Set make three copies of Infinity? Why would infinity do that?

 

[rob]

You are beyond reasoning, antichrist.

You are wrong sir, the verse does not say


Pr 8:22 ¶ The LORD possessed me AFTER in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.

Infinity could not later decide to make or create an angel as a son, that would not make infinity, all knowing.
Everything about infinity in itself, must exist before anything else exists, otherwise it is not infinity and all knowing.
So your premise of Infinity later wanting a cherub angel is foolish.

You also violate the Hebrew words

Heb 1:5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

Answer no angel. Not even the first one every created, who was Lucifer by the way, not Jesus-YHWH.

But than you do not like two YHWH do you, as Gen 19:24 presents?

 

[rob]

Let me ask you my friend, does a father have a beginning?

Because in my child like brain, a son come from a father too?

So these English terms are not correct, describing the Divine persons here... do you consider it
a terrible translation issue? Can you describe GOD using English words even?

Pr 8:22 ¶ The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.

This is the ONLY verse in the OT explaining the "me" using two Hebrew words "beginning" and "eternal back in time"

Now why must the JW invent notions the Bible does not say?

You laugh because you have no answer.