The Trinity Controversy | Randy Skeete

I study the Bible (and translations of it) from MANY sources, and, more or less, trust the scholars when everyone says the same thing!
My friend, I knew (deceased) a Hebrew Greek scholar in my SDA church, his name Dr Eric Livingstone, who could quote the entuire NT from memory in both English and Greek. We hardly agreed on anything. Later he told me to buy a book called Semantics of Hebrew by James Barr. There was hardly anything in the book I agreed to. I said this is a book you grow up with as a undergraduate, he said yes. I said no wonder we disagree so much.

You are talking to a person who does not agree with many scholars - my experiences are mine alone.

I give you one example" Language - in a language you can have words that are both noun and verb and thus should have the same basic meaning. But scholars disregard this because they don't like following the language rules they translate from.

The same is the idea of polysemy. Hebrew is a broad language, Greek is narrow. So the world today is Greek, and this is a problem.
I like Jeff Benner because I see words have a single basic meaning regardless of its context.

How many scholars know the paleo Hebrew the oldest Hebrew Moses wrote? The scholarship is less than 50 years old. So you will clash with scholars who regard such things as rubbish. Even today Jewish scholars say Solomons palace never existed !

Even Jews today write Hellenistic Hebrew, not the Ancient Hebrew Moses knew.

Narrow is the way the Bible says and few find it. Shalom
 
Even to it omits the very name of God (as others do)? And includes changes in the original meaning of the words? And uses a language FAR different from English now!
Yes I have a old English poem on my website, translated into modern English by two professors who disagree with one another !


For example "Hwaet" is old English. One translates this as "What" the other as "Lo" ? See the problem? You can't even get English professors agreeing on how to read English that is from 15th century.

SO how is a professor going to read Hebrew from 3000 BC?

Shalom
 
I ACTUALLY believe the Bible.
Christ said that the ONLY true God is His father. (John 17:3)
Eph 3:7- I became a servant of this gospel by the gift of God's grace given me through the working of his power.

Holy Spirit=the Power of God!
But you believe that the Holy Spirit is a person 👇🏿
Such Arrogance.
You don't believe the holy spirit a PERSON?

Rather than cutting & pasting, let's try to keep it simple- point by point!
Would you mind reconciling these two?
 
My friend, I knew (deceased) a Hebrew Greek scholar in my SDA church, his name Dr Eric Livingstone, who could quote the entuire NT from memory in both English and Greek. We hardly agreed on anything. Later he told me to buy a book called Semantics of Hebrew by James Barr. There was hardly anything in the book I agreed to. I said this is a book you grow up with as a undergraduate, he said yes. I said no wonder we disagree so much.

You are talking to a person who does not agree with many scholars - my experiences are mine alone.

I give you one example" Language - in a language you can have words that are both noun and verb and thus should have the same basic meaning. But scholars disregard this because they don't like following the language rules they translate from.

The same is the idea of polysemy. Hebrew is a broad language, Greek is narrow. So the world today is Greek, and this is a problem.
I like Jeff Benner because I see words have a single basic meaning regardless of its context.

How many scholars know the paleo Hebrew the oldest Hebrew Moses wrote? The scholarship is less than 50 years old. So you will clash with scholars who regard such things as rubbish. Even today Jewish scholars say Solomons palace never existed !

Even Jews today write Hellenistic Hebrew, not the Ancient Hebrew Moses knew.

Narrow is the way the Bible says and few find it. Shalom

Rob, you used a different word that ruah/pnume.
 
520239577-638984462558883-4680253855878097590-n.jpg
 
Back
Top